Linux Hater's Blog: Sounds like fun

Friday, March 11, 2011

Sounds like fun

http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2011/03/11/lessons-learned/

tl;dr of the tl;dr: C.L.U.S.T.E.R.F.U.C.K.

5000 flames:

«Oldest ‹Older 4801 – 5000 of 5000 Newer› Newest»

TM Repository said...: I think you went overboard listing his talents.

LOL, they're not talents, they're facts. He writes about tech. Fact, not talent. He refutes the tech press. Fact, not talent. He plays devil's advocate to people like mac fans. Fact, not talent. He calls bullshit on HTML5 replacing flash. Fact, not talent.; May 29, 2011 at 2:42 AM
Anonymous said...: When he announced he was anon a few posts back.

Jerkface posted as an anon?
How does that make him a whistleblower?; May 29, 2011 at 2:43 AM
Anonymous said...: LOL, they're not talents

When was he a whisteblower?; May 29, 2011 at 2:45 AM
TM Repository said...: But he's nothing special. Just another average blogger.

I never said he was anything but "meh". He's usually a decent read, that's it. That's all he's supposed to be. All I said was his focus hasn't changed much; He wasn't the anti-Linux crusader you claim he once was.

You see a sellout, I see business as usual. Nothing more, nothing less.; May 29, 2011 at 2:46 AM
Anonymous said...: When was he a whisteblower?; May 29, 2011 at 2:47 AM
TM Repository said...: When was he a whisteblower?

The Linux malware and virus posts are decent examples. He posted a link to a recent Linux malware discovery that Slashdot and ZDNet buried.

Keep in mind, whistle-blowing is not a talent (in the metaphorical sense).

And since you're hung up on this point, how about explaining away all the other "talents that are actually facts".; May 29, 2011 at 2:48 AM
Anonymous said...: He wasn't the anti-Linux crusader you claim he once was

His early posts were anti-GPL.

But he changed his focus to be more main-stream when he changed to binplay.; May 29, 2011 at 2:49 AM
Anonymous said...: He posted a link to a recent Linux malware discovery that Slashdot and ZDNet buried.

That's not being a whistleblower.

It's called posting a link that slashdot/zdnet haven't posted on their sites.; May 29, 2011 at 2:50 AM
Anonymous said...: Keep in mind, whistle-blowing is not a talent

You should check the definition.; May 29, 2011 at 2:51 AM
TM Repository said...: That's not being a whistleblower.

It's called posting a link that slashdot/zdnet haven't posted on their sites.

Play the symantics game. He brought a threat to light when every other pro-Linux organization were burying.

The link WAS posted on their respective sites and both the pro-Linux tech press and slashdot commenters played it down. Slashdot even tried to bury it with downvotes.; May 29, 2011 at 2:54 AM
Anonymous said...: He writes about tech.

He writes about random crap.

He plays devil's advocate to people like mac fans.

He hates on Mac fans. Different to playing devil's advocate.
Comparing them to brainwashed big-brother subjects is just plain hating.

He calls bullshit on HTML5 replacing flash

To you, perhaps. To me, he's writing bullshit in defence of Flash.; May 29, 2011 at 2:55 AM
Anonymous said...: Play the symantics game. He brought a threat to light when every other pro-Linux organization were burying.

He is not a whistleblower. Jerkface was linking to someone else's discovery.

Whistleblowing has a very clear definition. What he did was not it.; May 29, 2011 at 2:59 AM
TM Repository said...: He writes about random crap.

Other than the baseball post, what comes to mind? I guess if a tech blogger writes the occasional post about anything other than tech, they're mainstream and selling out?

He hates on Mac fans. Different to playing devil's advocate.
Comparing them to brainwashed big-brother subjects is just plain hating.

He did the same thing with Linux fans and distro junkies. But that was okay. Because they're losers in their basements rather than losers in Starbucks.

There are zealots in all camps and they're all fair game. This from someone who owns a macbook and argued against some of his claims. So far, my comments have escaped his wrath!; May 29, 2011 at 3:02 AM
TM Repository said...: He is not a whistleblower. Jerkface was linking to someone else's discovery.

Whistleblowing has a very clear definition. What he did was not it.

Okay, let's look up the definition:

"whistle blower: an informant who exposes wrongdoing within an organization in the hope of stopping it;"

Interesting. So when both a ZDNet author and slashdot commenters are trying to downplay a security threat rather than inform the public, that's not wrongdoing? Jerkface calling them out by posting the link and buried comments isn't being an informant? Does he not want it to stop?; May 29, 2011 at 3:06 AM
TM Repository said...: Is ZDNet an organization? Why yes, it is. Is Slashdot an organization? Yes.

Did they both commit acts of wrongdoing by downplaying the threat rather than trying to warn users? Yes.; May 29, 2011 at 3:08 AM
Anonymous said...: So when both a ZDNet author and slashdot commenters are trying to downplay a security threat rather than inform the public, that's not wrongdoing?

Does he work at ZDNet or Slashdot, and reveal from the inside the policy of supressing the threat? No he did not.

He discovered nothing new. He was not exposing a threat. He was linking to someone else exposing a threat.

Now your trying to make him out as some hero, which is kinda sad.; May 29, 2011 at 3:12 AM
Anonymous said...: A whistle blower has to come from within an organisation. That's the whole point.; May 29, 2011 at 3:14 AM
Anonymous said...: Is ZDNet an organization? Why yes, it is. Is Slashdot an organization? Yes.

Is Jerkface within either of these organizations?; May 29, 2011 at 3:17 AM
TM Repository said...: Does he work at ZDNet or Slashdot, and reveal from the inside the policy of supressing the threat? No he did not.

Remember when you said it has a "very specific definition"? Being an employee or working inside the organization is not part of that definition. Just having knowledge of misconduct and bringing it to light classifies someone as a whistle-blower if other organizations are trying to suppress it.; May 29, 2011 at 3:18 AM
Anonymous said...: misconduct and bringing it to light classifies someone as a whistle-blower if other organizations are trying to suppress it.

What misconduct?

Jerkface is no different from any other visitor to zdnet or slashdot.

How would he know about misconduct that any other vistor wouldn't know?; May 29, 2011 at 3:20 AM
Anonymous said...: trying to suppress it.

Get real.

A story is not 'suppressed' just because it gets downvoted.; May 29, 2011 at 3:22 AM
TM Repository said...: A story is not 'suppressed' just because it gets downvoted.

ZDNet actually claimed it wasn't a threat, saying nobody need worry since it would be fixed by the the basement developer army.

Jerkface called them out for pushing their agenda over public safety. Split hairs all you want, its whistle blowing.

(Right about now you can start claiming that I must really admire him for being such an awesome and courageous person or something.); May 29, 2011 at 3:29 AM
Anonymous said...: He called them out. Fine.

But what wrongdoing did he expose to the public?; May 29, 2011 at 3:36 AM
TM Repository said...: But what wrongdoing did he expose to the public?

The actual suppression of the threat. Lying to the public about something potentially dangerous is doing something wrong.

The fact that the danger existed is inconsequential. It's how the danger was handled that he blew the whistle on.; May 29, 2011 at 3:40 AM
Anonymous said...: Right about now you can start claiming that I must really admire him

Your obviously unfamilar with the term.; May 29, 2011 at 3:41 AM
Anonymous said...: The actual suppression of the threat. Lying to the public about something potentially dangerous is doing something wrong.

How did ZDNet supress the threat!?

ZDNet may have downplayed the threat, different to supressing it.

And ZDNet was far from the only source of the story.; May 29, 2011 at 3:43 AM
Anonymous said...: Lying to the public about something potentially dangerous is doing something wrong.

How do you know they were lying, and not expressing an opinion?; May 29, 2011 at 3:44 AM
Anonymous said...: It's how the danger was handled that he blew the whistle on.

What do you mean 'how the danger was handled'?; May 29, 2011 at 3:45 AM
Anonymous said...: Being an employee or working inside the organization is not part of that definition. Just having knowledge of misconduct and bringing it to light classifies someone as a whistle-blower if other organizations are trying to suppress it.

In your mind only. from legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Whistleblowing:

The disclosure by a person, usually an employee in a government agency or private enterprise, to the public or to those in authority, of mismanagement, corruption, illegality, or some other wrongdoing.

down voting articles isn't mismanagement, corruption, illegal, or even close to be considered wrong doing.

You are grasping at straws to support your poorly phrased argument.; May 29, 2011 at 3:46 AM
TM Repository said...: How do you know they were lying, and not expressing an opinion?

Because it was in the security section of ZDNet, but it read like the threat wasn't a threat at all.

A lot of "Linux is inherently secure" rhetoric, downplaying and a "users should have nothing to worry about" capstone.

Meanwhile, similar Microsoft threats are treated like they're teetering on the edge of apocalypse.; May 29, 2011 at 3:47 AM
Anonymous said...: What post is TM Repo even referring to?
Sounds like he called Jerkface a whistleblower without realizing what it means and now grasps at straws..; May 29, 2011 at 3:47 AM
Anonymous said...: Because it was in the security section of ZDNet, but it read like the threat wasn't a threat at all.

Do you have links to what you're talking about?; May 29, 2011 at 3:49 AM
Anonymous said...: A lot of "Linux is inherently secure" rhetoric, downplaying and a "users should have nothing to worry about" capstone.

Meanwhile, similar Microsoft threats are treated like they're teetering on the edge of apocalypse.

Jerkface wasn't exactly the first person to realize this..; May 29, 2011 at 3:53 AM
TM Repository said...: Do you have links to what you're talking about?

Here is the most recent one about the zero-day firefox exploit. And once again, ignored by slashdot with an IE exploit in its place.; May 29, 2011 at 3:55 AM
Anonymous said...: He did the same thing with Linux fans and distro junkies. But that was okay. Because they're losers in their basements rather than losers in Starbucks.

Yeah well you're not playing devil's advocate if you're genuinely opposed to the thing you're arguing.; May 29, 2011 at 3:55 AM
JoeMonco said...: Death to jerkface! Grrrr...

(five years later)

... rrrrrrgh! Damn you to hell!; May 29, 2011 at 3:56 AM
TM Repository said...: Jerkface wasn't exactly the first person to realize this..

I never said he was. He's just calling bullshit on Slashdot and ZDNet.

You're spinning your wheels here. Character attacks didn't work so now it's just semantic spam.; May 29, 2011 at 3:56 AM
Anonymous said...: Slashdot not reporting on zero-day exploits is NOT THE SAME as Slashdot supressing information on zero-day exploits.

The exploits were out there on Bugtraq and such. Slashdot not reporting them is NOT THE SAME as Slashdot supressing them.

Did NBC report these zero-day exploits? No? Then do you think they are supressing them? If I write a blog calling out NBC, to I become a whistleblower?

That answer is NO; May 29, 2011 at 3:58 AM
JoeMonco said...: He hates on Mac fans.

Jerkface hates on Mac fans? Poor them!

To me, he's writing bullshit in defence of Flash.

Still trying to get over the fact that your piece of crap iPad can't even do Flash?; May 29, 2011 at 3:59 AM
TM Repository said...: Yeah well you're not playing devil's advocate if you're genuinely opposed to the thing you're arguing.

What's your point? Even if I was misusing the term it doesn't change the fact that everything I listed was part of a synopsis and not an "advertisement of awesomeness".

Do you think that if you keep posting pointless details the comment history will magically disappear?; May 29, 2011 at 4:02 AM
JoeMonco said...: Jerkface wasn't exactly the first person to realize this..

Stop the presses - Jerkface wasn't exactly the first person to take notice of Linux loon rhetoric!

In other news - Anonymous was not the first person to post knee-jerk criticism on the Internet!; May 29, 2011 at 4:03 AM
Anonymous said...: You're spinning your wheels here. Character attacks didn't work so now it's just semantic spam.

Nope, its just people calling bullshit on your argument. We're all "whistleblowers" just to bastardize your bastardization of the term.; May 29, 2011 at 4:08 AM
TM Repository said...: Nope, its just people calling bullshit on your argument. We're all "whistleblowers" just to bastardize your bastardization of the term.

What argument? You're splitting hairs over the exact definition of whistleblower. You're arguing the semantics, not the facts. Why? Because you've got no rebuttal to the facts. You're trying, in vain, to use distraction in the hopes that I'll somehow forget the original argument.

1) Jerkface does tech posts.
2) He refutes tech press.
2) He has always done these.

Whether the use of the term "whistleblower" satisfies your definition of the word is irrelevant.; May 29, 2011 at 4:14 AM
Anonymous said...: In other news - Anonymous was not the first person to post knee-jerk criticism on the Internet!

In other news JoeMonco just freebased an 8-ball and ate his neighbors lhasa apso pup.; May 29, 2011 at 4:15 AM
JoeMonco said...: Don't like Jerkface? Then brace yourself for this stunningly elegant solution:

- Read something else.

Saves you yelling about the same old crap for months on end.; May 29, 2011 at 4:15 AM
Anonymous said...: TM Repository said:

One part devil's advocate, one part whistle-blower. He calls bullshit on any tech articles he finds; Linux, Mac and even Windows.

It Slices! It Dices! It Cleans Up After Itself!; May 29, 2011 at 4:19 AM
Anonymous said...: What have you got for us today JoeMonco?

A two line snark? A wikipedia link perhaps?; May 29, 2011 at 4:20 AM
Anonymous said...: What argument?

Your argument that Jerkface is a whistleblower. Jeeze; May 29, 2011 at 4:23 AM
Anonymous said...: 1) Jerkface does tech posts.
2) He refutes tech press.
2) He has always done these.

Well whoopdey freakin' do! Do any of those justify the time you've spent feeding the trolls tonight?

Of course not.

Whether the use of the term "whistleblower" satisfies your definition of the word is irrelevant.

Nonsense. it is entirely relevant that you are misusing terminology in a diabolical use of bad arguments used to feed trolls.; May 29, 2011 at 4:23 AM
Anonymous said...: So TM Repository has spent the last 200 comments insisting that jerkface is meh..; May 29, 2011 at 4:25 AM
TM Repository said...: "One part devil's advocate, one part whistle-blower. He calls bullshit on any tech articles he finds; Linux, Mac and even Windows."

Are those facts or talents?

1) He has played devil's advocate; just because the virus article has him actually taking the side he believes in doesn't mean its the only article he wrote.

2) He's been a whistleblower. The problem is, your personal definition of what that is doesn't compute.

3) He's called bullshit on tech articles of all sorts.

How has this changed since he first started? all these same facts still apply.; May 29, 2011 at 4:25 AM
Anonymous said...: So TM Repository has spent the last 200 comments insisting that jerkface is meh..

Crack will do that.; May 29, 2011 at 4:27 AM
Anonymous said...: He's been a whistleblower.

Well no he hasn't.

Check out whistle-blower resources online sometime. How might learn something.; May 29, 2011 at 4:27 AM
Anonymous said...: 1) He has played devil's advocate; just because the virus article has him actually taking the side he believes in doesn't mean its the only article he wrote.

2) He's been a whistleblower. The problem is, your personal definition of what that is doesn't compute.

3) He's called bullshit on tech articles of all sorts.

Erm, what tech blogger hasn't done these things?; May 29, 2011 at 4:28 AM
TM Repository said...: So TM Repository has spent the last 200 comments insisting that jerkface is meh

Yup, pretty much. Business as usual was the argument from the beginning.

It's entertainment; something to read. I'm not some butthurt-fan-turned-troll who's whining that jerkface sold out. "You used to be COOL, Jerkface! Whaa".; May 29, 2011 at 4:28 AM
Anonymous said...: Erm, what tech blogger hasn't done these things?

<Using TM Repos own personal misdefinition of whistle-blowing, of course); May 29, 2011 at 4:28 AM
Anonymous said...: You used to be COOL, Jerkface!

Who said that?; May 29, 2011 at 4:29 AM
Anonymous said...: Some mythical anon; May 29, 2011 at 4:30 AM
TM Repository said...: Erm, what tech blogger hasn't done these things?

Erm, what's your point? Hasn't the "jerkface isn't special" point been beaten to death yet?

The point has always been that jerkface did this when he started, and he hasn't changed. All that's changed is fanboy's perception that's been clouded by nostalgia.

He misses the good old days when Jerkface used to write articles slamming the tech press and calling them on their bullshit...oh wait.; May 29, 2011 at 4:30 AM
Anonymous said...: Whenever you point out that jerkface has done douchey things, TM Repo leaps to his defense!; May 29, 2011 at 4:31 AM
JoeMonco said...: What have you got for us today JoeMonco?

A two line snark? A wikipedia link perhaps?

Nothing. Why, should I start ranting about some blogger on the Internet until I drop dead?; May 29, 2011 at 4:31 AM
Anonymous said...: Two line snark it is!; May 29, 2011 at 4:33 AM
Anonymous said...: So TM Repo, you deny that JF changed direction when he went from JFPlayhouse to binplay?; May 29, 2011 at 4:34 AM
JoeMonco said...: Two line snark it is!

And dead on at that, mind you.; May 29, 2011 at 4:34 AM
TM Repository said...: Using TM Repos own personal misdefinition of whistle-blowing, of course

Right, which I got from the dictionary:

"whistle blower: an informant who exposes wrongdoing within an organization in the hope of stopping it;"

"Whistleblowers may make their allegations internally (for example, to other people within the accused organization) or externally (to regulators, law enforcement agencies, to the media or to groups concerned with the issues)."

Erin Brockovich is an example of an external whistleblower. In case you were still skeptical of the definition.; May 29, 2011 at 4:35 AM
Anonymous said...: So Jerkface is like Erin Brockovich.

Gotcha.; May 29, 2011 at 4:36 AM
Anonymous said...: And the wrongdoing: Posting on his blog that in his opinion a ZDNet author and slashdot commenters are trying to downplay a security threat.

Not exactly the same as exposing wrongdoing, is it?; May 29, 2011 at 4:38 AM
Anonymous said...: It's a fiendishly clever plot.; May 29, 2011 at 4:41 AM
JoeMonco said...: So Jerkface is like Erin Brockovich?

I think that's kind of a matter of taste. Like Mac. Or some other forms of self-mutilation.; May 29, 2011 at 4:41 AM
TM Repository said...: So TM Repo, you deny that JF changed direction when he went from JFPlayhouse to binplay?

I recall him mentioning he was going to change direction, but it's been more of the same. I guess because he's written a few articles about piracy and Xbox that he must have sold out and be totally mainstream, right?

So if he talks about smartphones is that no longer tech? What about tablets, not tech either? What about Netflix, is that not tech because my dad can use it?!

We need to set some strict guidelines on what random people consider relevant content for Jerkface to be posting!!!; May 29, 2011 at 4:41 AM
Anonymous said...: Another two line snark! Surely the wikipedia link must be soon!; May 29, 2011 at 4:43 AM
TM Repository said...: So Jerkface is like Erin Brockovich?

LOL. I was going to remark that you shouldn't get the two confused, but I removed it. Guess I should have left it in.

Both were concerned with public safety in one way or another and neither worked for the perpetrating organization.; May 29, 2011 at 4:44 AM
Anonymous said...: I'd like to know why TM Repository insists on answering every criticism of Jerkface posted to this blog.

Why is it so TM Repository?; May 29, 2011 at 4:44 AM
TM Repository said...: And the wrongdoing: Posting on his blog that in his opinion a ZDNet author and slashdot commenters are trying to downplay a security threat.

So a linux enthusiast site and a linux security blog posting an IE threat but burying a Linux threat is open to interpretation? You're fucking desperate.; May 29, 2011 at 4:45 AM
Anonymous said...: Both were concerned with public safety in one way or another and neither worked for the perpetrating organization.

What did JF reveal? He expressed an opinion about ZDNet and slashdot.

Very different to actually discovering something being covered up..; May 29, 2011 at 4:46 AM
TM Repository said...: Why is it so TM Repository?M

Already answered that. Because I felt like taking the troll bait that Bitter Jerkface Fanboy dropped.; May 29, 2011 at 4:46 AM
JoeMonco said...: Another two line snark! Surely the wikipedia link must be soon!

Why not?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPad#Reviews

"After its UK release the Telegraph said the iPad's lack of Adobe Flash support was 'annoying.'"

I prefer the term "female circumcision" a bit more, to be honest.; May 29, 2011 at 4:46 AM
Anonymous said...: Already answered that. Because I felt like taking the troll bait that Bitter Jerkface Fanboy dropped.

Because you like being trolled?

Are you really that lonely?

Maybe you should get a job and be around people.; May 29, 2011 at 4:48 AM
TM Repository said...: What did JF reveal? He expressed an opinion about ZDNet and slashdot.

Very different to actually discovering something being covered up.

Not true. If a friend helps you cover up a murder they're an accessory to it. It's still a cover up and they're still responsible.

Just because it wasn't Firefox covering up the exploit doesn't mean that Slashdot and ZDNet are off the hook. They're spreading dangerous misinformation that could result directly in damages.

It's one thing to have a broken staircase in your house, it's quite the other to put a sign that says "staircase is fine, jump up and down on them".; May 29, 2011 at 4:52 AM
Anonymous said...: They're spreading dangerous misinformation that could result directly in damages.

Where's your proof?

Oh that's right, you're talking out you're ass.; May 29, 2011 at 4:55 AM
Anonymous said...: Just because it wasn't Firefox covering up the exploit doesn't mean that Slashdot and ZDNet are off the hook. They're spreading dangerous misinformation that could result directly in damages.

Bullshit. Firefox has auto-update on the platforms that matter. And the platforms that don't matter have suppositories that get checked automatically daily.

Care to try again?; May 29, 2011 at 4:55 AM
TM Repository said...: Because you like being trolled

LHB brah! We feed the trolls. (we argue fact with them until they start doing their death rattle, talking in circles).

Are you really that lonely?

Says the troll.

Maybe you should get a job and be around people.

You're right, why be productive when I can be distracted every 5 minutes with watercooler chatter. Sounds awesome. I can probably simulate it by starting a daycare in my living room. Man, I'm glad you taught me how to be social. By the way, can you spare a dollar, I'm broke now. Idiot.; May 29, 2011 at 4:56 AM
TM Repository said...: Bullshit. Firefox has auto-update on the platforms that matter. And the platforms that don't matter have suppositories that get checked automatically daily.

The exploit wasn't fix that quickly, goofball. All the auto-updating in the internet won't do you any good if there's no actual patch to send.

Try again.; May 29, 2011 at 4:58 AM
JoeMonco said...: And the platforms that don't matter have suppositories that get checked automatically daily.

You mean like CentOS?; May 29, 2011 at 4:58 AM
Anonymous said...: You're right, why be productive when I can be distracted every 5 minutes with watercooler chatter.

LOL looking through the last 300 comments, you're clearly being distracted by LHB every couple minutes.; May 29, 2011 at 4:58 AM
TM Repository said...: Where's your proof?

Oh that's right, you're talking out you're ass.

I sent you the link. I know reading is tough.; May 29, 2011 at 4:59 AM
Anonymous said...: Well thank the flying spaghetti monster that jerkface told us all about it...; May 29, 2011 at 5:00 AM
Anonymous said...: They're spreading dangerous misinformation that could result directly in damages.

Nothing suggests that it's misinformation, and no mention of damages.

Try again.; May 29, 2011 at 5:01 AM
Anonymous said...: You mean like CentOS?

Don't be an ungrateful bastard, Joe, take the free software I make by following the licensing requirements and be happy with it.; May 29, 2011 at 5:02 AM
Anonymous said...: WOW TM repository has sunk to a new all time low..; May 29, 2011 at 5:02 AM
TM Repository said...: Just a quick summary of facts Bitter Jerkface Fanboy has gleaned:

- Jerkface sold out and is rich from blog traffic alone
- his focus has changed from tech writing to tech writing
- one article off topic (baseball) cancels out all your other writing
- every week at least 3 posts are made on LHB proclaiming how awesome jerkface is
- making a synopsis is tantamount to gushing praise
- whistleblowing is NOT informing the public of an organization's wrongdoing
- Jerkface is Erin Brockovich
- Mac hate is bad, but Linux hate is acceptable
- people go to work to socialize
- working during the night means you have Aspergers
- facts are actually talents
- talking in circles wins arguments; May 29, 2011 at 5:09 AM
Anonymous said...: And your point is..?

You like being trolling?; May 29, 2011 at 5:12 AM
TM Repository said...: You like being trolling?

Like is the wrong word. I welcome a voice of dissent. Too bad they can never back shit up.; May 29, 2011 at 5:14 AM
Anonymous said...: Srsly TM, I respected you for making the repository, but looking at the last couple pages.. you are turning a litle strange..; May 29, 2011 at 5:16 AM
TM Repository said...: WOW TM repository has sunk to a new all time low..

LAUNCH MORE CHARACTER ATTACKS!!1; May 29, 2011 at 5:17 AM
TM Repository said...: Srsly TM, I respected you for making the repository, but looking at the last couple pages.. you are turning a litle strange

First jerkface, now me? But the whole point of the TM Repository was to garner respect from people I've never met. That, and mad AdSense cash.

You think it's strange that I'd spend time refuting a whining butthurt fanboy after building an entire site dedicated to the same practice?; May 29, 2011 at 5:22 AM
Anonymous said...: You still think that all anonymous posts are the same person, eh?; May 29, 2011 at 5:27 AM
TM Repository said...: You still think that all anonymous posts are the same person, eh?

well "double dot" sure is.. Ending all sentences with..; May 29, 2011 at 5:42 AM
Anonymous said...: Nemo Documents
http://www.nemo-docs.com/

is kind of like Gnome Zeitgeist, but for Windows; May 29, 2011 at 5:51 AM
Anonymous said...: well "double dot" sure is.. Ending all sentences with..

and all anons come in waves every three hours!; May 29, 2011 at 6:03 AM
Dr Loser said...: @May 29, 2011 1:48 AM:

I'm curious, why do you think it matters? Why do I, or anyone for that matter, have to create a name so you can tell how many people you are arguing with?

Good question. And here's another one:

Why is Seven of Nine called Seven of Nine?

Borg me, baby!; May 29, 2011 at 6:39 AM
TM Repository said...: and all anons come in waves every three hours!

I see what you tried to do there.; May 29, 2011 at 6:47 AM
Dr Loser said...: Joe Monco@May 29, 2011 4:58 AM:

And the platforms that don't matter have suppositories that get checked automatically daily.

You mean like CentOS?

To be scrupulously fair, the anonymous it did say "suppositories." Almost certainly insoluble ones, at that. ((c) Reginald Perrin.) Probably an elegant and refined not an anonymous troll whatsoever and how dare you call me that then.

By the way, where is this awesome Nametard community? I must've been out when they dropped the leaflet by.; May 29, 2011 at 6:54 AM
Anonymous said...: OMFG, TMR is spending an incredible amount of time sucking his cock. Even whores don't stoop that low.

There's no way one would do so much to protect some random blogger "just because", or "being the devil's advocate".

$100 says it's really the same guy who has two accounts.; May 29, 2011 at 7:01 AM
Anonymous said...: So which one is better: Windows, or Linux?; May 29, 2011 at 7:07 AM
Dr Loser said...: @May 29, 2011 7:01 AM:

$100 says it's really the same guy who has two accounts.

Make it a thousand and you're on. I could do with travel money to visit both of them. I mean, just the Toronto to Seattle bit would cost half of that.

Tell you what, I'm a reasonable sort of guy. I'll give you 100/1 odds.

You stand to gain $100,000! What could be more appetizing than that?; May 29, 2011 at 7:29 AM
Anonymous said...: I hear a lot about Ubuntu these days. Is it any good?; May 29, 2011 at 7:36 AM
Dr Loser said...: But back to Linux and, specifically, CentOS:

The problem is, if we knew how to fix the particular problems that we have, then they would already be fixed.

Yes, you read that right.

(1) Collect a million eyes. (I wrote about this yesterday on my blog, you little twerp.)
(2) ???
(3) Problem is already fixed!

It's a miracle, this Linux thing. I don't know what I'd do without it.

Oh yes, that's it. That's the thing. ACTUALLY FIX BUGS!; May 29, 2011 at 7:39 AM
Anonymous said...: Make it a thousand and you're on

Either:
-he's his lover (I ain't judging)
-it's the same person who uses 2 accounts
-he's being paid
-he's got serious mental issues

So which one is it? Nobody sane would spend that much time to defend a random blogger (especially one with such an incredibly shitty blog) to such great lengths. I mean, that's beyond whoring yourself...

Not that he has a point though. Pretty weak material all-around, refuting everything without any basis. And coming up with ludicrous theories in the process (3 years? LOL).

The only thing TMR has that's worth reading, is the user-submitted content on his site. Other than that, he's pretty fucking boring.; May 29, 2011 at 7:49 AM
Anonymous said...: So which one is better: Windows, or Linux?

Linux.; May 29, 2011 at 8:26 AM
Anonymous said...: Jerkface actually deleted one of my comments for calling a freetard a freetard. Fuck that dickhead.; May 29, 2011 at 8:29 AM
Anonymous said...: TM Suppository is actually more pathetic then Jerkface. His entire deal was to somehow cash in on the Linux hate by creating an anti-Linux site with hipster-approved graphics and Web 2.0. Unlike Jerkface, he actively tries to spam every single anti-Linux place he can kind (oh did you know I added a new feature to my gay site? come check it out). Surely the AdSense money should be rolling in by now.

All he has managed to do with his site is attract Queefer and a handful of other nametards who do nothing but troll and counter-troll each other. Hell the only reason he probably didn't ban Queefer by now is because he knows he is a nametard honeypot that's keeping his site alive.; May 29, 2011 at 8:53 AM
CentOS said...: The CentOS community is great.

Don't complain about something you are being given for free (you ungrateful bastards) but we don't want to give you a donation button either.; May 29, 2011 at 9:14 AM
Changing default paper size to A4 said...: Windows:
1) Select Printer Properties
2) Select A4
(although in my experience a United Kingdom locale and printers defaults to this anyway)

Linux:
1) Try a bunch of shit that doesn't work
2) Put an ugly hack that might break stuff into some obscure settings file; May 29, 2011 at 9:18 AM
Anonymous said...: Why is my Ubuntu installation becoming more and more unstable and taking longer and longer to boot?

dmesg is full of segfaults in Nautilus.; May 29, 2011 at 9:20 AM
Anonymous said...: Can't you ungrateful bastard take the free software Canonical make by following the licensing requirements and be happy with that?; May 29, 2011 at 10:07 AM
Anonymous said...: Holy crap, TM literally spent the entire night defending jerkface? I guess doing that is why he earnestly believes it was one (and only one) dude that stuck with him for eight hours.; May 29, 2011 at 10:33 AM
Anonymous said...: Eight hours of pure cock sucking. He looks like a natural! Or is it that he enjoys it that much?; May 29, 2011 at 10:39 AM
Anonymous said...: So which one is better: Linux, or cow dung?

Cow dung.; May 29, 2011 at 10:40 AM
Anonymous said...: @May 29, 2011 9:18 AM:

If you think that's bad, try getting Intel onboard audio working... And should you use the digital sound output, then you're not done yet!; May 29, 2011 at 10:46 AM
Anonymous said...: I want to find a GF that would suck my cock as much as TMR did, without even being asked!; May 29, 2011 at 10:47 AM
Anonymous said...: Why does Anonymous keep talking to himself?; May 29, 2011 at 11:07 AM
Jerkface said...: I want to find a GF that would suck my cock as much as TMR did, without even being asked!

Sorry, TMR is taken.; May 29, 2011 at 11:10 AM
Anonymous said...: Maybe it's because I need sleep. Commenting 24 hours a day takes it out of me.

CAPTCHA: dembacid. What I'm taking to stay up. Fuck my heart's racing.; May 29, 2011 at 11:11 AM
Anonymous said...: Stallman declines to speak in Israeli Universities because the Palestinians force him not to. So much for "freedom of speech". Right?

http://hamakor.org.il/pipermail/discussions/2011-May/002978.html; May 29, 2011 at 11:23 AM
Anonymous said...: "I've always lived cheaply ... like a student, basically. And I like that, because it means that money is not telling me what to do." -- Richard Stallman

Right ...; May 29, 2011 at 11:28 AM
Anonymous said...: So I can go, and cancel these
speeches, or not go, and cancel these speeches.

I think it is best if I go, and give the speeches they originally
invited me to give.
Translation: I will take the free holiday thank you.; May 29, 2011 at 11:59 AM
Anonymous said...: Edward sums it up quite nicely:

"You chose the "Free beer" giving up the "Free of speech" and that disappoints me very much since it has to do with the genuinity implementation of your own presented ideas."; May 29, 2011 at 12:03 PM
Anonymous said...: Translation: I will take the free holiday thank you.

What's wrong with that?; May 29, 2011 at 12:13 PM
Dr Loser said...: @May 29, 2011 12:13 PM:

What's wrong with that?

There's a song by Jello Biafra that makes the point quite nicely, I think.

Alternatively, you could just read the post above yours.

An attention span is a terrible thing to waste.; May 29, 2011 at 12:22 PM
Anonymous said...: Stallman declines to speak in Israeli Universities because the Palestinians force him not to.

Way to shoot yourself in the foot Hamas. This kind of "boycott" can only be good for the Israeli people.; May 29, 2011 at 12:29 PM
Anonymous said...: An attention span is a terrible thing to waste.

"Jersey Shore" does that.; May 29, 2011 at 1:04 PM
Anonymous said...: The problem is, if we knew how to fix the particular problems that we have, then they would already be fixed.

Yes, you read that right.

(1) Collect a million eyes. (I wrote about this yesterday on my blog, you little twerp.)
(2) ???
(3) Problem is already fixed!

Except the community in CentOS is only allowed to support each other, not help in the rebuild process.

You are off the mark in this criticism, Loser.

Which is amusing considering that CentOS is bad enough that you don't need to take things out of context to make them look bad, you silly twit.; May 29, 2011 at 1:20 PM
Anonymous said...: High five Joe! Us "namers" have to stick together. When you're a celebrity and raking in those AdSense dollars you've gotta know who your friends are. Amiright?

Or you could just admit you're a big fan of JerkFace(TM) and that your comments were reflecting this.

Meh.; May 29, 2011 at 3:04 PM
Anonymous said...: I like how obsessed this guy is over AdSense. Someone throws out that maybe possibly Jerkface is attempting to expand his audience and maybe possibly attempting to monetize it (or some other "secret" blog) and TM has an aneurysm and spews diarrhea. Like the idea of monetizing a blog is so controversial. Even Linux Hater tried to do it.; May 29, 2011 at 3:31 PM
Anonymous said...: I like how obsessed he is with the idea that only one person argues with him.; May 29, 2011 at 3:44 PM
TM Repository said...: OMFG, TMR is spending an incredible amount of time sucking his cock. Even whores don't stoop that low.

You haven't been on LHB that long then, have you? Every few months a new batch of anon trolls show up here to do some phishing. "HTML vs CSS guy", "Eugenics Guy", etc. We feed them all, letting them paint themselves into a corner with their bullshit arguments.

There's no way one would do so much to protect some random blogger "just because", or "being the devil's advocate".

Except that I wasn't protecting anyone. I was just pulling apart the whinings of a butthurt jerkface fan who's heartbroken thinking jerkface has apparently sold out.

$100 says it's really the same guy who has two accounts.

I already made that joke. That's what the AdSense remarks were all about. I kept referring to myself as the "silent partner" that was mentioned earlier. Keep up.; May 29, 2011 at 3:53 PM
Anonymous said...: Whatever happened to the "Jerkface is laying a trap" guy? Supposedly jumping the shark was some grand reverse-reverse-reverse-reverse-reverse-troll scheme that would culminate in a massive 1-2 punch to the GPL that would make computers explode as if Captain Kirk outwitted them at logic.; May 29, 2011 at 3:56 PM
Anonymous said...: I like how obsessed he is with the idea that only one person argues with him.

One person that doesn't need sleep and has nothing to do besides post on LHB every two minutes 24/7.; May 29, 2011 at 3:58 PM
TM Repository said...: I like how obsessed he is with the idea that only one person argues with him.

Yeah, "obsessed". Remarking about something more than once is a clear sign of obsession. Idiot.

"I like how obsessed he is about X", weakest trolling ever. Does anyone else miss the real trolls that used to come here? Bring back Blackbelt Jones.; May 29, 2011 at 4:02 PM
Anonymous said...: Does anyone else miss the real trolls that used to come here? Bring back Blackbelt Jones.

We don't need new trolls, we have you, Loser, and Joe. Fuckwit.; May 29, 2011 at 4:23 PM
TM Repository said...: We don't need new trolls, we have you, Loser, and Joe. Fuckwit.

Yeah, twist those words. I said I missed the old trolls. Ever heard of irony? Whining about how things have changed, getting all nostalgic. Remind you of anybody?; May 29, 2011 at 4:30 PM
Anonymous said...: He calls bullshit on HTML5 replacing flash. Fact, not talent.

Speaking of "calling bullshit", that's not fact, that's opinion. "Calling bullshit" on a technology is an opinion.

You're so busted Suppository guy(TM).; May 29, 2011 at 4:31 PM
Anonymous said...: If I choose Ubuntu, should I then go for long-term support, or will the regular edition do?; May 29, 2011 at 4:43 PM
Anonymous said...: Remind you of anybody?

Reminds me of your 8 hour rant about how average jerkface is.; May 29, 2011 at 4:43 PM
Anonymous said...: Another question. Can Windows 7 run comfortably on a notebook with 768MB RAM?; May 29, 2011 at 4:46 PM
TM Repository said...: Speaking of "calling bullshit", that's not fact, that's opinion. "Calling bullshit" on a technology is an opinion.

Being able to quantify that flash still has a 99% install base across the web in spite of HTML5 adoption on all browsers is a fact. The death of Flash didn't happen like the loons or the Steve Jobs faithful predicted.; May 29, 2011 at 5:01 PM
Anonymous said...: Do you have links to what you're talking about?; May 29, 2011 at 5:03 PM
TM Repository said...: Reminds me of your 8 hour rant about how average jerkface is.

My responding to whining is actually a rant? I shot down arguments, I didn't go off on any tangents. All the while receiving nothing but character attacks, red herrings, ad hominems and strawmen. Is that what passes for a rant these days?; May 29, 2011 at 5:06 PM
TM Repository said...: Do you have links to what you're talking about?

Already posted them several times.; May 29, 2011 at 5:06 PM
Anonymous said...: Read something else. Saves you yelling about the same old crap for months on end.; May 29, 2011 at 5:08 PM
Anonymous said...: Already posted them several times.

Too bad they can never back shit up.; May 29, 2011 at 5:13 PM
Anonymous said...: Being able to quantify that flash still has a 99% install base across the web in spite of HTML5 adoption on all browsers is a fact..

We're not talking about quantifying "that flash still has a 99% install base", we're talking about quantifying your statement which was:

He calls bullshit on HTML5 replacing flash

For which the argument is calling bullshit on HTML5 replacing flash - not "has replaced" but "is" or "will replace" Flash. Nice try at shifting though.

The death of Flash didn't happen like the loons or the Steve Jobs faithful predicted

Nice shift again, subtle too. This might seem overly pedantic but this furthers my point (my premise) that you are backtracking on the fact that you're backing up Jerkface when you said you weren't as the other anons were painfully pointing out to you.; May 29, 2011 at 5:21 PM
Anonymous said...: Linux Hater:

Just post the new token commentary and let us continue flaming in here for fuck sakes. We're not asking for much. Type the letter 'a' and press submit. Christ.; May 29, 2011 at 5:24 PM
Dr Loser said...: Hate to waste one of the last forty or so posts, but here I go.

@May 29, 2011 1:20 PM:

Except the community in CentOS is only allowed to support each other, not help in the rebuild process.

I see. There's arbitrary limits to this freedom thing now, are there?

You are off the mark in this criticism, Loser.

Doctor Loser to you. I have my professional pride.

Which is amusing considering that CentOS is bad enough that you don't need to take things out of context to make them look bad, you silly twit.

I didn't take it out of context. I fucking linked to it.

Piss all over me for whatever reason you feel necessary, but at least be honest for once in your shitty little life.; May 29, 2011 at 5:28 PM
Anonymous said...: you are backtracking on the fact that you're backing up Jerkface when you said you weren't

To you, perhaps. To me, he's writing bullshit in defence of Flash.; May 29, 2011 at 5:28 PM
Dr Loser said...: May 29, 2011 5:24 PM:

Linux Hater:

Just post the new token commentary and let us continue flaming in here for fuck sakes. We're not asking for much. Type the letter 'a' and press submit. Christ.

This. Also, tl;dr. Maybe niggers.

But basically this.; May 29, 2011 at 5:31 PM
TM Repository said...: Nice shift again, subtle too. This might seem overly pedantic but this furthers my point (my premise) that you are backtracking on the fact that you're backing up Jerkface when you said you weren't as the other anons were painfully pointing out to you.

Sure, when you can't attack the fact, attack the argument, or better yet, attack the character of the person you're arguing with.

You're desperately trying to insinuate that I've been rushing to his defense/singing praises/obsessing. Meanwhile, I'm not the one whining and protesting in another blog about how he's "sold out" and "went mainstream".

Saying Jerkface hasn't changed isn't really a defense. Because if you don't like him now, and he hasn't changed, then it means you didn't like him then either. By making him unpalatable to you is somehow defending him?

At this point you've totally lost track of your argument and you're hoping to distract. You claimed Jerkface sold out and went mainstream, meanwhile he's posting the same shit he always has but you're pretending to be butthurt.; May 29, 2011 at 5:41 PM
Anonymous said...: I didn't take it out of context. I fucking linked to it.

Are you sure about that?

you wrote this: The problem is, if we knew how to fix the particular problems that we have, then they would already be fixed.

Yes, you read that right.

(1) Collect a million eyes. (I wrote about this yesterday on my blog, you little twerp.)
(2) ???
(3) Problem is already fixed!

while linking to a mail about the issues they are having with rebuilding RHEL 6, a process that is not open to any community involvement.

Taking said mail out of context by implying there is community involvement, when there is none.

Piss all over me for whatever reason you feel necessary, but at least be honest for once in your shitty little life.

The thing is, I don't have to piss on you, you do it to yourself. Honest enough for you?

Now go blog about it, you twit.; May 29, 2011 at 5:44 PM
Anonymous said...: You see business as usual, I see a sellout. Nothing more, nothing less.; May 29, 2011 at 5:46 PM
JoeMonco said...: Taking said mail out of context by implying there is community involvement, when there is none.

Translation: "You don't know nothing about the community, wah!"

What would the world be without open-source loons clogging up usable space?; May 29, 2011 at 6:00 PM
Anonymous said...: What have you got for us today JoeMonco? A two line snark? A wikipedia link perhaps?; May 29, 2011 at 6:04 PM
TM Repository said...: Character attacks abound! It's trolling in 2011.

To be honest, I kind of do miss the classic trolls we used to get here. Maybe I'll go whine about it on another blog's comment section.; May 29, 2011 at 6:07 PM
TM Repository said...: What have you got for us today JoeMonco? A two line snark? A wikipedia link perhaps?

You know you're a professional troll when you've got lame-ass jabs like these bound to macros. What does trolling pay these days?; May 29, 2011 at 6:08 PM
Anonymous said...: Character attacks abound! It's trolling in 2011.

There are zealots in all camps and they're all fair game.; May 29, 2011 at 6:13 PM
Anonymous said...: You know you're a professional troll when you've got lame-ass jabs like these bound to macros. What does trolling pay these days?

LHB brah! We feed the trolls. (we argue fact with them until they start doing their death rattle, talking in circles).; May 29, 2011 at 6:16 PM
TM Repository said...: There are zealots in all camps and they're all fair game.

What does that have to do with character attacks, Adam?; May 29, 2011 at 6:27 PM
JoeMonco said...: professional troll

I prefer the term "sanctimonious twit having their pet cause ragged on by someone else".; May 29, 2011 at 6:32 PM
Anonymous said...: What does that have to do with character attacks, Adam?

The best refute you guy can make is that it's the fault of some dude named adam??; May 29, 2011 at 6:37 PM
Anonymous said...: calls bullshit on HTML5 replacing flash

That's up there with calling bullshit on the rapture last week.

-Only a small subset of the browsers currently used (and not only on desktops) support HTML5
-HTML can do video and has canvas, and even if that was supported well (it's not) that still wouldn't make it a flash equivalent, there's still lots of ground to cover, like sound
-There is nothing quite like Flash Pro to author non-flash content, and much less the training that goes with it, and having the mindshare too
-Flash is also useful for playing H.264 videos on browsers/platforms that don't support it natively
...

Only Ohio Ham would be stupid enough to think it could kill Flash.; May 29, 2011 at 6:38 PM
Anonymous said...: Character attacks abound!

If you don't want your character being attacked stop being such a fuckwit.; May 29, 2011 at 6:39 PM
Anonymous said...: The best refute you guy can make is that it's the fault of some dude named adam??

A year or so ago a notorious pro-FOSS troll named Adam King said that he was bored posting as a nametard and rather troll anonymously or something along those lines. From then on, anyone who is Anonymous is collectively known as Adam "Queefer" King. Even if he never actually posted anonymously, he has done so much damage to this place with that one comment then he could have ever done with just plain trolling. Because now no matter who you are, if you post anonymously and someone doesn't like you, you are the "queefer".; May 29, 2011 at 6:46 PM
JoeMonco said...: That's up there with calling bullshit on the rapture last week.

To you, perhaps. To me, he's writing bullshit in defence of Flash.; May 29, 2011 at 6:48 PM
Anonymous said...: I prefer the term "sanctimonious twit having their pet cause ragged on by someone else".

That's a good way to describe you, JoeMongoloid.; May 29, 2011 at 6:50 PM
JoeMonco said...: That's a good way to describe you, JoeMongoloid.

And what would my pet cause be, eh?

Or is this just another knee-jerk NoU(TM)?; May 29, 2011 at 6:53 PM
Anonymous said...: Your own self-ego?; May 29, 2011 at 6:54 PM
Anonymous said...: Reminds me of your 8 hour rant about how average jerkface is.

@May 28, 2011 10:36 PM, TM Repository said...

I love this attempt at reverse trolling Jerkface by claiming he sold out. Can't refute him? Don't feel like participating in the discussion? Then try to undermine his credibility instead. Genius.

I'd say he's right on topic considering he's always stated that he all about the tech industry in general. He never claimed to be some dedicated anti-Linux crusader.

20 hours later and still going strong!; May 29, 2011 at 6:55 PM
Anonymous said...: At least we call all agree that Jerkface is just 'meh'.

Even when he's calling bullshit or whistleblowing, he's just 'meh'.

Ain't it so, TM repository?; May 29, 2011 at 6:58 PM
Anonymous said...: And what would my pet cause be, eh?

Two line snarks and wikipedia links of course!; May 29, 2011 at 7:12 PM
Anonymous said...: Well I hope TMR gets his shill check from Jerkface.

He sure has earnt it!; May 29, 2011 at 7:13 PM
Anonymous said...: Wow, you really took offense when Jerkface deleted your trolling, didn't you?; May 29, 2011 at 7:20 PM
Anonymous said...: Type the letter 'a' and press submit. Christ

LOL, that'd be hilarious. There'd be 200 complaints from people who forgot they had LHB on their RSS feeds.; May 29, 2011 at 7:30 PM
Anonymous said...: If you don't want your character being attacked stop being such a fuckwit.

TM's the digital equivalent of the girl who strips naked, draws "fuck me" on herself with permanent marker, patrols frathouse row on Friday night, then complains she got raped.; May 29, 2011 at 7:34 PM
Anonymous said...: Remind you of anybody?
Adam, maybe?

Now go blog about it, you twit.
He will, and you, do you have anything left ... eh, Adam?

What have you got for us today JoeMonco? A two line snark? A wikipedia link perhaps?

The best refute you guy can make is that it's the fault of some dude named adam??

We’ve been through this Adam.

To quote Anonymous:
Seriously Adam? Is copy-pasta all you have left?

Not even the ability to post a witty reply?

You really have nothing left, do you?; May 29, 2011 at 7:35 PM
TM Repository said...: At least we call all agree that Jerkface is just 'meh'.

Even when he's calling bullshit or whistleblowing, he's just 'meh'.

Ain't it so, TM repository?

I never said otherwise. He's a decent read but nobody's "advertising his awesomeness 3 times a week".; May 29, 2011 at 7:36 PM
Anonymous said...: Now JoeMonco is posting as anonymous. Great.; May 29, 2011 at 7:37 PM
Anonymous said...: That's up there with calling bullshit on the rapture last week.

More like calling bullshit on the new york yankees winning the stanley cup; May 29, 2011 at 7:39 PM
TM Repository said...: If you don't want your character being attacked stop being such a fuckwit.

I don't mind the character attacks, they're harmless and these ones are particularly desperate. I'm just pointing out that character attacks, red herrings, ad hominems and strawmen are all indications of a lost argument. Fallacies are the troll fallback.; May 29, 2011 at 7:39 PM
Anonymous said...: I never said otherwise. He's a decent read but nobody's "advertising his awesomeness 3 times a week".

Except you.

You keep rushing to his defense anytime someone says something bad about him.

Have a browse thru the last ~400 comments if you don't believe me.; May 29, 2011 at 7:39 PM
Anonymous said...: I'm just pointing out that character attacks, red herrings, ad hominems and strawmen are all indications of a lost argument

What argument are they making, and losing?; May 29, 2011 at 7:40 PM
Anonymous said...: Right. The most annoying nametards have now been handed their asses, except for the good Doctor Loser. I have a special gift for him, but I want him to be sober when it gets delivered. See you tomorrow for another groundhog day on LHB.; May 29, 2011 at 7:41 PM
Anonymous said...: More like calling bullshit on the new york yankees winning the stanley cup

Fuck, when the hell are they gonna institute salary caps? This is getting fucking ridiculous.; May 29, 2011 at 7:42 PM
.net jerkface said...: It does seem that linux hater doesn't post as much, could I get any volunteer moderators if I started a blog?

June 8, 2009 8:23 PM; May 29, 2011 at 7:43 PM
Anonymous said...: ...the girl who strips naked, draws "fuck me" on herself with permanent marker, patrols frathouse row on Friday night, then complains she got raped.

So when your father fucks you in the ass, you willingly participate?

And you are upset that others don't like it, when you, your rapist father or your whore mother screw around...

...

You know Adam, at this point, the only solution to your problems is fire.

Fact is we should torch your family as well.; May 29, 2011 at 7:45 PM
Anonymous said...: LOL more TM Repo/JoeMonco posting as anon.; May 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM
Anonymous said...: Only 4 posts remain!; May 29, 2011 at 7:48 PM
Anonymous said...: LOL more TM Repo/JoeMonco posting as anon.

LOL, it's actually me.

But I don't mind if you attribute my post to either TMR or Joe.

They might; but what can you do, life is hard here on LHB.; May 29, 2011 at 7:50 PM
Anonymous said...: 3 to go...; May 29, 2011 at 7:51 PM
Anonymous said...: Re: TM Repositories 24 hours trollfest,

I haven't seen such monomania since Joe Monco and the Java Calendar class..; May 29, 2011 at 7:51 PM
Anonymous said...: Just 2 more!; May 29, 2011 at 7:52 PM

«Oldest ‹Older 4801 – 5000 of 5000 Newer› Newest»

Linux Hater's Blog

Friday, March 11, 2011

Sounds like fun

5000 flames:

Got anything rant-worthy? or just plain stupid?

Hater Merch

Greatest Hates

Old grudges (archive)

Linkydinks

Hater Wannabes

Offshoots